love Dolberger citizens attached is to inform you about the latest developments in relation to the proposed eastern bypass.
Arne Engelbrecht is on 03.12. the concerns in relation to the proposed route of the present city of Ahlen.
Until then, lies with the Family Engelbrecht (Long wall 24) of a petition.
Here, the contents of the letter to the Planning Department Ahlen:
Early citizen participation realignment FNP, concerns and suggestions
Dear Mr Schulte,
we hereby notify the residents Dolberg (name register the signatories of the petition pending), concerns relating to the route planning for the eastern bypass of the district Dolberg.
A: Remember
The disadvantages of the routing are obvious: first
rather than relieve, the burden Gepl. Road to the ground, in particular the construction area "Long wall" by its various pollutants. But the Dillweg and the adjacent areas of the Carnation Street. The area of \u200b\u200bpotential conflict does not stop at the border of the plots. Pollution knows no borders.
second transport planning The intended path is not useful because it brings into the market in the city, instead of passing it forward. It created new hubs with associated emissions and the main road as far as 61 can not be dismantled in order to close them unattractive to the heavy traffic.
third the transport planning context of the overall concept for the Ahlen urban area have been highlighted inadequate, particularly in the traffic after completion of the ring road east Ahlen and the eastern and western bypass Dolberg: see forecast system
4th remains high burden on residents there Ostdolbergs
5th urban development will cut the planned route to the site and inhibit its further development sustainable: A convergence of Dolberg-center / long wall and Ostdolberg is not with the proposed road process possible. The existing bike path / old railway line is not considered a hindrance, since it can be built up close to the embankment. Conditioning städtebaul. Development opportunities
6th , the planned bypass road ends at the Uentrop where near the new bicycle path crossing this road. The recovery operation is no longer necessary and thus creates a risk focus.
7th In addition, the highly sensitive ecological area opposite the Uentrop road through the new transport hub sensitive disturbed, if not destroyed.
8th the protected area in the cemetery area is compromised
9th route has been planned, as the construction area was not planned and therefore obsolete technology planning. The new circumstances (see above) must be considered.
B: Suggestions: Instead of planning
technically outdated version, we propose another alternative (already passed).
advantages: first
the marketing of its emissions are derived directly above Dolberg
second during the remainder are much less affected residents
third likely, the existing Bridge be used as a cycle track crossing
4th more accessible and hence commercialization of the proposed business park Ostdolberg
5th better utilization of the business park Ostdolberg by alternative road, compensation areas and stormwater retention plans.
6th Minimize the additional costs of the longer route possibly even synergistic effects (4 +5.) Which cancel the additional costs even.
7th the urban development Dolberg is guaranteed
8th The recovery function of the bike trail is maintained, the area is not disturbed cemetery
9th the ecologically sensitive area towards the road Uentrop remains unaffected
10th the intervention in the landscape can immediately spot by appreciation of the pond between the bike path and lane offset
5 plants: like Plan: Trassierungsvorschlag with details, traffic, housing development, petition
Herewith we would like to ask you to reconsider your plan to process and to ultimately reduce errors in the assessment.
normal Sincerely
the signatories (see petition)
